Back to all articles
Firm News

Bennett Legal Files Brief in Texas Supreme Court Case on Employer Arbitration Plans

Bennett Legal filed a Texas Supreme Court brief for an injured worker. See what the case is about and what it means for workers with arbitration plans.

Charles Bennett4 min read
Employer Arbitration Plan Case: Texas Supreme Court Brief

Bennett Legal has filed a brief in the Texas Supreme Court in a case about an employer arbitration plan. The case number is 25-0983. We filed it for a Texas worker who was hurt on the job in 2015. More than ten years later, he is still waiting for a decision on his claim.

Free consultation

Hurt at work, and your employer has an arbitration plan?

Bennett Legal helps hurt workers in arbitration and on appeal. Free case evaluation.

Start Your Free Case Review(972) 972-4969

Super Lawyers® is a registered trademark of Internet Brands, Inc.

What Is This Employer Arbitration Plan Case About?

Texas lets private employers choose not to carry workers' compensation insurance. These employers are called "non-subscribers." Many of them make hurt workers use a private arbitration plan instead. Arbitration is a private way to settle a claim. The employer writes the plan. A person called an arbitrator decides the claim, not a judge.

Read this graphic as text: Employer arbitration vs. court litigation infographic
WORKPLACE INJURY DISPUTES Employer arbitration vs. court litigation Understanding two different ways workplace injury disputes may be resolved Employer arbitration PROCESS A private dispute-resolution process. DECISION-MAKER An arbitrator generally decides the claim. RULES Procedures depend on the arbitration agreement and applicable law. APPEAL OPTIONS Appeal and judicial review options may be limited. COSTS Arbitration-related administrative fees may apply. Court litigation PROCESS A judicial process generally conducted through the public court system. DECISION-MAKER A judge or jury decides issues as permitted by law. RULES Court procedures are governed by applicable laws and court rules. APPEAL OPTIONS Appeals depend on the type of ruling and applicable procedural rules. COSTS Court filing fees and other litigation expenses may apply. TAKEAWAY Whether arbitration or litigation is available depends on the agreement, the type of claim, and applicable law.

Our client's employer was one of these employers. Here is what happened.

  1. He was hurt on the job in 2015. His employer did not have workers' comp insurance.
  2. He followed his employer's arbitration plan. He went through arbitration two times. Then he filed the appeal the plan allowed.
  3. The arbitration company said the employer had to pay the appeal fee. The public record shows the fee was not paid. In September 2021, the arbitration company closed the case. It later said it would not reopen the case on its own.
  4. He then filed a lawsuit in Dallas County. The employer asked the judge to send the case back to arbitration. The judge held hearings. She never signed an order saying yes or no.
  5. The court mailed a routine notice that set the case for trial. The employer appealed. It said the notice meant the judge had said no to arbitration.
  6. The Dallas Court of Appeals dismissed the appeal. It said there was no order to appeal. The employer then asked the Texas Supreme Court to look at that decision.
Read this graphic as text: Timeline of an injured worker's path through arbitration
CASE TIMELINE An Injured Worker’s Path Through Arbitration Understanding the events behind the Texas Supreme Court dispute 2015 WORKPLACE INJURY A Texas worker is injured while employed by a company that does not carry traditional workers’ compensation insurance. ARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS The worker participates in arbitration proceedings and an appeal process under the employer’s arbitration plan. September 2021 ARBITRATION CASE CLOSED The arbitration administrator closes the proceeding after the employer’s appeal fee is not paid. DALLAS COUNTY LITIGATION The injured worker pursues a lawsuit. The employer seeks to return the dispute to arbitration. COURT OF APPEALS DECISION The appeal is dismissed because no signed, appealable court order was entered. October 2026 TEXAS SUPREME COURT BRIEF Bennett Legal submits a brief addressing the arbitration dispute and legal questions concerning appealability. Case timeline summarized for educational purposes. Procedural details should be verified against the court record.

What Does Our Brief Say?

We filed our brief in October 2026. It asks the Court to leave the court of appeals' decision in place. It makes three main points.

Read this graphic as text: Three key arguments in Bennett Legal's Texas Supreme Court brief
SUPREME COURT BRIEF Three Key Arguments in Bennett Legal’s Supreme Court Brief Understanding the procedural issues presented to the Court No Signed Order, No Appeal Bennett Legal argues that a routine trial-setting notice does not constitute a signed, appealable order resolving an arbitration issue. Follow the Proper Legal Procedure The brief argues that a party seeking a delayed ruling should pursue an appropriate trial-court procedure rather than bypassing the trial court. Arbitration Already Ended Bennett Legal argues that the injured worker should not be required to restart arbitration after the administering company closed the proceeding over an unpaid arbitration fee. IMPORTANT These are arguments advanced in Bennett Legal’s brief, not a final ruling by the Texas Supreme Court.

No signed order, no appeal. A notice that sets a trial date is not an order about arbitration. Earlier this year, in Paxton v. City of Austin, the Texas Supreme Court held that when a trial court has not signed an order, there is nothing to appeal, even when the court moves the case toward trial.

There is a right way to ask a judge to rule. If a judge is taking too long, a party can ask a higher court to tell the judge to decide. Our client does not oppose that. What he opposes is skipping the trial judge.

The arbitration already ended. If the Court looks at this question, our brief explains that federal law treats the arbitration as "had" when the arbitration company ends the case because a fee was not paid. The employer should not be able to make him start over.

The case is still pending. The Court has not ruled. You can read the brief yourself. It is a public court filing under case number 25-0983 on the Texas Supreme Court's website.

What This Means If You Were Hurt at Work

Every case is different. But if your employer does not carry workers' comp and has an arbitration plan, these steps can help:

  • Ask for a copy of the plan in writing.
  • Keep every letter, email, and fee notice from the arbitration company.
  • Write down every deadline in the plan.
  • Talk to a lawyer early, before you decide what to do next. Here is what to expect at your first meeting with a lawyer.

Talk to Us

Bennett Legal helps hurt workers in arbitration and in court, including on appeal. If you were hurt at work and your employer has an arbitration plan, we can talk about your options. Learn more about our Dallas workplace injury work, or contact us for a free case evaluation. You can also read about another arbitration case we handled for a hurt worker.

Talk to Bennett Legal about your arbitration plan ->

Attorney advertising. Responsible attorney: Charles A. Bennett, Bennett Legal, Dallas, Texas. This article describes a pending case and public court filings. It is not legal advice. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes.

Free consultation

Hurt at work, and your employer has an arbitration plan?

Bennett Legal helps hurt workers in arbitration and on appeal. Free case evaluation.

Start Your Free Case Review(972) 972-4969

Super Lawyers® is a registered trademark of Internet Brands, Inc.

Related practice area

Learn about Bennett Legal’s arbitration lawyers and how we evaluate these matters.

employer arbitration plan Texas
Texas Supreme Court arbitration appeal
Texas non-subscriber employer arbitration
hurt at work arbitration plan